Verstappen Skeptical About Gravel Traps for Austin’s Track Limits Dilemma
During the recent United States Grand Prix, the Circuit of the Americas’ track limits became a hot topic once again. Many drivers, including some commentators, called for the installation of gravel traps to prevent repeated track limit violations. However, reigning world champion Max Verstappen expressed doubts about whether gravel is the right solution for Austin’s multi-purpose track.
One of the drivers caught up in the track limits controversy, Oscar Piastri, was among those suggesting that installing gravel traps would significantly reduce the incidents. Piastri, who was penalized for exceeding track limits, pointed out that other circuits have addressed similar problems by changing the run-off areas to gravel. “The easiest fix is to put gravel there—then no one will go off,” he explained, emphasizing the deterrent effect of such a change.
Yet, Verstappen argued that Austin’s unique position as a MotoGP venue complicates this solution. “While gravel could help us in Formula 1, it’s not ideal for motorbikes,” he remarked, noting that the gravel would need to be removed again for bike racing, similar to how it’s handled at Austria’s Red Bull Ring. This dual-purpose use of the circuit means finding a solution that works for both cars and motorcycles, making gravel traps less practical.
Verstappen also raised concerns about the impact on amateur drivers who use the track on non-race weekends. He explained that spinning off into gravel traps during track days could result in significant repair costs for less experienced drivers. “It might be effective for professional racing,” he said, “but I’m not sure it’s sustainable year-round.”
Ultimately, while the idea of gravel traps seems straightforward, Verstappen’s comments highlight the complexity of managing a circuit used by multiple racing disciplines and varying skill levels. Finding a solution that satisfies everyone may prove more challenging than anticipated.